Update week2-06-wal.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ Remember to recover the correct `next_sst_id` from the state, which should be `m
|
||||
* How costly is the `fsync` operation in general on an SSD (solid state drive)?
|
||||
* When can you tell the user that their modifications (put/delete) have been persisted?
|
||||
* How can you handle corrupted data in WAL?
|
||||
* Is it possible to design an LSM engine without WAL (i.e., use L0 as WAL)? What will be the implications of this design?
|
||||
|
||||
We do not provide reference answers to the questions, and feel free to discuss about them in the Discord community.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user