@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
||||
In this chapter, you will:
|
||||
|
||||
* Refactor your implementation to use key+ts representation.
|
||||
* Make your code compile with the new key representation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 0: Use MVCC Key Encoding
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
|
||||
# Snapshot Read - Memtables and Timestamps
|
||||
|
||||
In this chapter, you will:
|
||||
|
||||
* Refactor your memtable/WAL to store multiple versions of a key.
|
||||
* Implement the new engine write path to assign each key a timestamp.
|
||||
* Make your compaction process aware of multi-version keys.
|
||||
* Implement the new engine read path to return the latest version of a key.
|
||||
|
||||
During the refactor, you might need to change the signature of some functions from `&self` to `self: &Arc<Self>` as necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 1: MemTable, Write-Ahead Log, and Read Path
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
|
||||
# Snapshot Read - Engine Read Path and Transaction API
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 1: Store Largest Timestamp in SST
|
||||
In this chapter, you will:
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 2: Recover Commit Timestamp
|
||||
* Finish the read path based on previous chapter to support snapshot read.
|
||||
* Implement the transaction API to support snapshot read.
|
||||
* Implement the engine recovery process to correctly recover the commit timestamp.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 3: Lsm Iterator with Read Timestamp
|
||||
At the end of the day, your engine will be able to give the user a consistent view of the storage key space.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 4: Multi-Version Scan and Get
|
||||
## Task 1: Lsm Iterator with Read Timestamp
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 2: Multi-Version Scan and Get
|
||||
|
||||
For now, inner = `Fused<LsmIterator>`, do not use `TxnLocalIterator`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,6 +18,10 @@ explain why store txn inside iterator
|
||||
|
||||
do not implement put and delete
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 3: Store Largest Timestamp in SST
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 4: Recover Commit Timestamp
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Your Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
* So far, we have assumed that our SST files use a monotonically increasing id as the file name. Is it okay to use `<level>_<begin_key>_<end_key>_<max_ts>.sst` as the SST file name? What might be the potential problems with that?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user